Comments on: Major chkdsk Bug in Windows 7 RTM http://www.bluescreenofdeath.org/?p=94 Bloggings of a Technology Enthusiast Thu, 12 Nov 2009 16:14:07 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 By: Avedis http://www.bluescreenofdeath.org/?p=94&cpage=1#comment-200 Avedis Thu, 12 Nov 2009 16:14:07 +0000 http://www.bluescreenofdeath.org/?p=94#comment-200 I had the same problem when i had to upgrade from vista to windows 7 home, igot the blue screen of death shortly after installation.Is there some kind of fix or patch,PLEASE!!! I had the same problem when i had to upgrade from vista to windows 7 home, igot the blue screen of death shortly after installation.Is there some kind of fix or patch,PLEASE!!!

]]> By: Bob http://www.bluescreenofdeath.org/?p=94&cpage=1#comment-177 Bob Sat, 08 Aug 2009 09:55:13 +0000 http://www.bluescreenofdeath.org/?p=94#comment-177 If MS would actually let some competent programmers LOOK AT "their" code, they could have it fixed in hours. That's why the OS model is now the only way to develop software and operating systems. "Security" throuh obscurity doesn't work any more. If MS would actually let some competent programmers LOOK AT “their” code, they could have it fixed in hours. That’s why the OS model is now the only way to develop software and operating systems. “Security” throuh obscurity doesn’t work any more.

]]> By: Ryan Price http://www.bluescreenofdeath.org/?p=94&cpage=1#comment-172 Ryan Price Fri, 07 Aug 2009 18:45:42 +0000 http://www.bluescreenofdeath.org/?p=94#comment-172 The manufacturers one still do it and this is on an Intel chipset with 9.0 drivers installed..so this isnt a bug in the driver..its the actual process. The manufacturers one still do it and this is on an Intel chipset with 9.0 drivers installed..so this isnt a bug in the driver..its the actual process.

]]> By: Owen http://www.bluescreenofdeath.org/?p=94&cpage=1#comment-171 Owen Fri, 07 Aug 2009 16:48:47 +0000 http://www.bluescreenofdeath.org/?p=94#comment-171 <a href="#comment-137" rel="nofollow">@Ryan Price </a> <i>If its a controller driver how do you explain that it happens across , Intel, Nvidia, and any other maker’s.</i> Well, the previous post implies that it's when you use the generic (ie. MS supplied) chipset driver instead of the manufacturer supplied/specific ones. So the bug is in that. @Ryan Price
If its a controller driver how do you explain that it happens across , Intel, Nvidia, and any other maker’s.
Well, the previous post implies that it’s when you use the generic (ie. MS supplied) chipset driver instead of the manufacturer supplied/specific ones. So the bug is in that.

]]> By: Emanem http://www.bluescreenofdeath.org/?p=94&cpage=1#comment-169 Emanem Fri, 07 Aug 2009 16:14:42 +0000 http://www.bluescreenofdeath.org/?p=94#comment-169 Lol, but W7 seems a bad KDE/Gnome desktop...Really was expecting for something better... Lol, but W7 seems a bad KDE/Gnome desktop…Really was expecting for something better…

]]> By: tightsystem.com » Windows 7 bug likely not a ’showstopper’ http://www.bluescreenofdeath.org/?p=94&cpage=1#comment-168 tightsystem.com » Windows 7 bug likely not a ’showstopper’ Fri, 07 Aug 2009 03:47:50 +0000 http://www.bluescreenofdeath.org/?p=94#comment-168 [...] issue, noted on several enthusiast sites this week, involves a fairly arcane process used to check for problems in a particular disk. Under certain [...] [...] issue, noted on several enthusiast sites this week, involves a fairly arcane process used to check for problems in a particular disk. Under certain [...]

]]> By: dhisnotnull http://www.bluescreenofdeath.org/?p=94&cpage=1#comment-167 dhisnotnull Fri, 07 Aug 2009 01:35:08 +0000 http://www.bluescreenofdeath.org/?p=94#comment-167 I tried in a 2Gb of ram Celeron, memory usage elevated to about 1.5Gb but the system did not crash nor slowed down think this is by design as steven stated <strong><a href="http://www.chris123nt.com/2009/08/03/critical-bug-in-windows-7-rtm#comment-11469" rel="nofollow">Steven Sinofsky</a> :</strong> ... but that was resolved by design since we actually did design it to use more memory. But the design was to use more memory on purpose to speed things up, but never unbounded — we requset the available memory and operate within that leaving at least 50M of physical memory. Our assumption was that using /r means your disk is such that you would prefer to get the repair done and over with rather than keep working. </blockquote> This is not a critical bug, since its seldomly use and /r mostly used on old hard disk that just about to kill itself I tried in a 2Gb of ram Celeron, memory usage elevated to about 1.5Gb but the system did not crash nor slowed down think this is by design as steven stated
Steven Sinofsky :
… but that was resolved by design since we actually did design it to use more memory. But the design was to use more memory on purpose to speed things up, but never unbounded — we requset the available memory and operate within that leaving at least 50M of physical memory. Our assumption was that using /r means your disk is such that you would prefer to get the repair done and over with rather than keep working.

This is not a critical bug, since its seldomly use and /r mostly used on old hard disk that just about to kill itself

]]> By: Thranx http://www.bluescreenofdeath.org/?p=94&cpage=1#comment-165 Thranx Thu, 06 Aug 2009 20:23:54 +0000 http://www.bluescreenofdeath.org/?p=94#comment-165 <a href="#comment-137" rel="nofollow">@Ryan Price </a> It happens cross platform because it's the generic device driver. Unless you manually install the driver for the specific controller on each system, it'll use the generic MS one. If the problem's in the driver, then you'll see it regardless of make/model without installing the proper driver. @Ryan Price

It happens cross platform because it’s the generic device driver. Unless you manually install the driver for the specific controller on each system, it’ll use the generic MS one. If the problem’s in the driver, then you’ll see it regardless of make/model without installing the proper driver.

]]> By: Shiro http://www.bluescreenofdeath.org/?p=94&cpage=1#comment-164 Shiro Thu, 06 Aug 2009 19:39:30 +0000 http://www.bluescreenofdeath.org/?p=94#comment-164 Windows 7 RC here. 1,5Gb of RAM. Checkin error with '/r' option through explorer. It takes 800 Mb in a few seconds. I cancel the operation and qafter 30 seconds it free the 800Mb without problem. Windows 7 RC here. 1,5Gb of RAM. Checkin error with ‘/r’ option through explorer. It takes 800 Mb in a few seconds. I cancel the operation and qafter 30 seconds it free the 800Mb without problem.

]]> By: Microsoft Shoots Down "Critical" Windows 7 Bug | DUOWAN http://www.bluescreenofdeath.org/?p=94&cpage=1#comment-155 Microsoft Shoots Down "Critical" Windows 7 Bug | DUOWAN Thu, 06 Aug 2009 04:49:50 +0000 http://www.bluescreenofdeath.org/?p=94#comment-155 [...] blog, noting a report from the “bluescreenofdeath.org” blog, claimed that running a chkdsk command with the [...] [...] blog, noting a report from the “bluescreenofdeath.org” blog, claimed that running a chkdsk command with the [...]

]]>